Reviewer Guidelines
Comprehensive guidelines for reviewers contributing to the peer review process at MAMRR.
Role of Reviewers
Peer review is the cornerstone of scholarly publishing. As a reviewer for MAMRR, you play a crucial role in maintaining the quality and integrity of published research. Your expertise and constructive feedback help authors improve their work and ensure that only high-quality research reaches our readers.
Quality Assurance
Ensure manuscripts meet academic standards and contribute meaningfully to the field.
Constructive Feedback
Provide helpful suggestions to improve manuscript quality and clarity.
Timely Review
Complete reviews within the specified timeframe to maintain publication efficiency.
Confidentiality
Maintain strict confidentiality of manuscript content and author identity.
Review Process
Invitation to Review
You will receive an email invitation with manuscript title and abstract. Accept or decline within 3 days.
Access Manuscript
Upon acceptance, you will receive the full manuscript file and review form via email.
Conduct Review
Evaluate the manuscript based on originality, methodology, significance, and clarity. Complete within 14 days.
Submit Report
Submit your detailed review report with recommendation (Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject).
Editorial Decision
The editorial board considers all reviews and makes the final publication decision.
Evaluation Criteria
Originality
- Does the manuscript present original research?
- Is the work novel and not previously published?
- Does it contribute new knowledge to the field?
- Are the findings significant and impactful?
Methodology
- Is the research methodology appropriate and sound?
- Are the methods clearly described and reproducible?
- Is the sample size adequate?
- Are statistical methods properly applied?
Results & Analysis
- Are the results clearly presented?
- Is the analysis appropriate and thorough?
- Do the conclusions follow from the results?
- Are limitations adequately addressed?
Presentation
- Is the writing clear and well-organized?
- Are figures and tables appropriate and clear?
- Is the abstract informative and accurate?
- Are references complete and properly formatted?
Ethical Guidelines
Double-Blind Review
Maintain anonymity - neither authors nor reviewers know each other's identity.
Confidentiality
Treat manuscripts as confidential documents. Do not share with others.
Conflict of Interest
Decline review if you have any competing interests or personal relationships with authors.
Plagiarism Check
Report any suspected plagiarism or duplicate publication to the editorial office.
Constructive Feedback
Provide respectful, objective, and helpful comments to assist authors.
Timeliness
Complete reviews promptly or notify the editor if you need more time.
Become a Reviewer
Join our distinguished panel of reviewers and contribute to advancing scholarly research. We welcome experts from all disciplines covered by MAMRR.
Apply to Become a Reviewer